Every stage and every asset sequenced together rather than one stage at a time, traded off against contribution margin, and re-solved when the day changes.
Campaigns, sequence-dependent changeovers, cleanout requirements, crew and equipment capacity, storage silos and order due dates solved together rather than one stage at a time.
Changeover hours and asset utilization traded off against contribution margin, so the sequence reflects which products are worth the capacity. The schedule answers to the same priorities the CFO does.
Downtime, quality holds and urgent orders trigger a re-solve, with a change summary and the commitments at risk named.
Schedule changes requested in plain language, every recommendation explained, and the model learning from each override.
Batches at risk from feed quality or equipment state flagged before they are committed to the schedule.
The schedule is built in a spreadsheet by one or two planners, and the logic for building it lives in their heads. When they are away the plant runs on last week’s plan. When they retire, there is no alternative.
You know changeover hours are high and cannot say how far off the achievable minimum they are, so there is no target to manage against.
You have invested in a planning system, and the monthly plan the planners hand to the scheduler is set aside as soon as the meeting ends, because it does not reflect what is operationally possible.
Every disruption starts a manual replan. An asset trips or a batch goes on hold, and the recovery plan is whatever can be assembled in the next hour.
Sales asks whether an urgent order can be accepted and gets a judgment call rather than a costed answer. Commitments are made without knowing the changeover and displacement cost.
Constraint programming with decomposition for the campaign layer, solving to a provable optimum inside the model rather than applying heuristics.
Cleanout and changeover matrices sit in standard operating procedures. Sequencing rules, silo dedication, tank heels, change-control restrictions and customer quality agreements sit in documents. These are extracted into a machine-readable constraint library and a graph of assets and materials. It is the difference between a schedule that is feasible on paper and one planners will actually run.
When a planner changes the optimized schedule, the stated reason is captured and mapped to the constraint the model was missing. After the same override repeats, the agent proposes a permanent constraint for approval.
A planner states the intent in plain language. The co-pilot translates it into constraint changes, re-runs the optimizer, and returns the impact in changeover hours, margin and commitment conflicts before anything is confirmed. No parameter screens, and no overnight batch job.
Plant and order signals are watched continuously. Where the plant floor system is connected, an asset going down triggers the re-solve without waiting, and the recovery plan arrives with the displaced orders and the tradeoffs named.
A thirty-minute discovery call, including a demo of the application and what it would take to run it on your plants.